[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":48},["ShallowReactive",2],{"q-sw-106-1-policy-legislation-037":3},{"subject":4,"subjectSlug":5,"subjectFullName":4,"question":6,"related":23},"社會政策與社會立法","policy-legislation",{"id":7,"webId":8,"year":9,"session":10,"subject":4,"legacy":11,"number":12,"stem":13,"options":14,"answer":19,"answerNote":20,"images":21,"lawTimestamp":9,"explanation":22,"freq":10},"sw-106-1-社會政策與社會立法-037","sw-106-1-policy-legislation-037",106,1,false,37,"我國的二代健保改革，未能完成最初學者規劃的以家戶總所得課徵保費的改革目標，而改以課徵補充保費並保留原來的六大被保險人的保費課徵方式，請問下列何種理論最無法解釋此種社會政策的發展現象？",{"A":15,"B":16,"C":17,"D":18},"菁英主義","漸進主義","利益團體政治","歷史制度論","A",null,[],"本題考點是政策形成理論對二代健保「妥協式改革」的解釋力比較。依菁英主義,政策反映少數統治菁英的偏好並由上而下貫徹;但二代健保中,學者與行政部門規劃的家戶總所得制最終在立法過程被折衝修改,僅加徵補充保費並保留六類被保險人,顯非菁英意志的貫徹,故菁英主義最無法解釋,A 為正解。B 能解釋,漸進主義(Lindblom)主張政策是在現狀基礎上小幅修正,補充保費正是漸進調整;C 能解釋,各利益團體反對家戶總所得制,迫使方案妥協;D 能解釋,歷史制度論的路徑依賴指出既有六類保費制度結構限縮了改革選項。",[24,28,32,36,40,44],{"webId":25,"stem":26,"number":27,"year":9,"session":10},"sw-106-1-policy-legislation-036","福利多元主義強調社會福利的提供包括政府部門、商業部門、志願部門和非正式部門，請問下列何者是非正式部門？",36,{"webId":29,"stem":30,"number":31,"year":9,"session":10},"sw-106-1-policy-legislation-038","請問 1980 年我國政府因應國家的合法性危機通過的三大社會福利立法，不包括下列何者？",38,{"webId":33,"stem":34,"number":35,"year":9,"session":10},"sw-106-1-policy-legislation-035","學者認為不同的福利國家體制會造成不同的社會階層化效果，請問下列敘述何者正確？",35,{"webId":37,"stem":38,"number":39,"year":9,"session":10},"sw-106-1-policy-legislation-039","因應經濟的全球化，不同體制的福利國家採取的策略重點有所不同，請問下列敘述何者正確？",39,{"webId":41,"stem":42,"number":43,"year":9,"session":10},"sw-106-1-policy-legislation-034","請問下列何者是平衡工作與家庭（生活）需求的社會政策？",34,{"webId":45,"stem":46,"number":47,"year":9,"session":10},"sw-106-1-policy-legislation-040","學者 T. H. Marshall 認為公民權利（citizenship）包含三個部分，下列何者不包括在內？",40,1787299233797]