[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":48},["ShallowReactive",2],{"q-sw-106-1-research-methods-031":3},{"subject":4,"subjectSlug":5,"subjectFullName":4,"question":6,"related":23},"社會工作研究方法","research-methods",{"id":7,"webId":8,"year":9,"session":10,"subject":4,"legacy":11,"number":12,"stem":13,"options":14,"answer":19,"answerNote":20,"images":21,"lawTimestamp":9,"explanation":22,"freq":10},"sw-106-1-社會工作研究方法-031","sw-106-1-research-methods-031",106,1,false,31,"下列那一種抽樣方法獲得的樣本最具代表性？",{"A":15,"B":16,"C":17,"D":18},"簡單隨機抽樣","配額抽樣","系統抽樣","分層比例隨機抽樣","D",null,[],"本題考點是各種抽樣方法的代表性比較。依抽樣理論，分層比例隨機抽樣先依母群體的重要特性（如性別、年齡層）分層，再按各層占母群體的比例於層內隨機抽樣，確保樣本結構在分層變項上與母群體一致，抽樣誤差比簡單隨機抽樣更小，代表性最高，故選 D。A 簡單隨機抽樣雖是機率抽樣，但可能因機遇使某些次群體被抽中的比例失衡；B 配額抽樣是「非機率抽樣」，雖按比例設配額，但個案由訪員主觀選取，無法計算抽樣誤差、代表性無保證；C 系統抽樣的效果近似簡單隨機抽樣，且若母群名冊具週期性排列還可能產生系統性偏誤。",[24,28,32,36,40,44],{"webId":25,"stem":26,"number":27,"year":9,"session":10},"sw-106-1-research-methods-030","某研究調查 26～35 歲未婚者的「結婚意願」，自變項中的「年收入」分「300,000 元（含）以下」、「300,001-450,000 元」、「450,001-600,000 元」、「600,001 元（含）以上」四個選項。「結婚意願」是自行設計 8 題，每題 4 點尺度的 Likert 量表組成，分數越高表示結婚意願越強。若想比較不同收入的四組在結婚意願上是否有顯著差異，請問適合運用那一種統計方法？",30,{"webId":29,"stem":30,"number":31,"year":9,"session":10},"sw-106-1-research-methods-032","關於測量的「信度（reliability）」與「效度（validity）」，下列何種情形不可能出現？",32,{"webId":33,"stem":34,"number":35,"year":9,"session":10},"sw-106-1-research-methods-029","關於次級資料分析（secondary data analysis）的敘述，以下何者錯誤？",29,{"webId":37,"stem":38,"number":39,"year":9,"session":10},"sw-106-1-research-methods-033","如何把一個抽象的概念，轉變成為可以測量，並換成數字來呈現的歷程，稱為：",33,{"webId":41,"stem":42,"number":43,"year":9,"session":10},"sw-106-1-research-methods-028","下列那一項，並非行動研究（action research）的特性？",28,{"webId":45,"stem":46,"number":47,"year":9,"session":10},"sw-106-1-research-methods-034","測量一個概念時，能反映涵蓋此概念所包含意義多寡的程度，稱為：",34,1787299233276]