[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":48},["ShallowReactive",2],{"q-sw-106-1-research-methods-034":3},{"subject":4,"subjectSlug":5,"subjectFullName":4,"question":6,"related":23},"社會工作研究方法","research-methods",{"id":7,"webId":8,"year":9,"session":10,"subject":4,"legacy":11,"number":12,"stem":13,"options":14,"answer":19,"answerNote":20,"images":21,"lawTimestamp":9,"explanation":22,"freq":10},"sw-106-1-社會工作研究方法-034","sw-106-1-research-methods-034",106,1,false,34,"測量一個概念時，能反映涵蓋此概念所包含意義多寡的程度，稱為：",{"A":15,"B":16,"C":17,"D":18},"內容效度","內在效度","建構效度","表面效度","A",null,[],"本題考點是效度類型的辨析。依測量理論,內容效度(content validity)指測量工具的題項能涵蓋所欲測量概念全部意涵的程度,通常由專家判斷題項是否足以代表概念的各個面向,正是題幹所述「涵蓋此概念所包含意義多寡」,故選 A。B 內在效度是研究設計層次的用語,指因果推論不受混淆因素干擾的程度,與測量涵蓋度無關。C 建構效度指測量結果與理論建構間關係獲得驗證的程度,如聚斂與區辨效度,並非指意義涵蓋多寡。D 表面效度僅指測量「看起來」像在測該概念,是最表淺的主觀判斷,不涉及概念意涵的完整涵蓋。",[24,28,32,36,40,44],{"webId":25,"stem":26,"number":27,"year":9,"session":10},"sw-106-1-research-methods-033","如何把一個抽象的概念，轉變成為可以測量，並換成數字來呈現的歷程，稱為：",33,{"webId":29,"stem":30,"number":31,"year":9,"session":10},"sw-106-1-research-methods-035","關於「訪問調查法」，以下敘述何者錯誤？",35,{"webId":33,"stem":34,"number":35,"year":9,"session":10},"sw-106-1-research-methods-032","關於測量的「信度（reliability）」與「效度（validity）」，下列何種情形不可能出現？",32,{"webId":37,"stem":38,"number":39,"year":9,"session":10},"sw-106-1-research-methods-036","以下何者非「電話訪問」的優點？",36,{"webId":41,"stem":42,"number":43,"year":9,"session":10},"sw-106-1-research-methods-031","下列那一種抽樣方法獲得的樣本最具代表性？",31,{"webId":45,"stem":46,"number":47,"year":9,"session":10},"sw-106-1-research-methods-037","下列何者屬於因果性的問題？",37,1787299233301]