[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":48},["ShallowReactive",2],{"q-sw-108-1-social-work-026":3},{"subject":4,"subjectSlug":5,"subjectFullName":4,"question":6,"related":23},"社會工作","social-work",{"id":7,"webId":8,"year":9,"session":10,"subject":4,"legacy":11,"number":12,"stem":13,"options":14,"answer":19,"answerNote":20,"images":21,"lawTimestamp":9,"explanation":22,"freq":10},"sw-108-1-社會工作-026","sw-108-1-social-work-026",108,1,false,26,"根據 Reamer（1995）對於業務過失（malpractice）的定義，社會工作師原先計畫和案主一起出席社區改建的公聽會，卻未事先告知當日無法出席而讓案主獨自出席，這是屬於何種業務過失？",{"A":15,"B":16,"C":17,"D":18},"瀆職","濫權","侵權","怠職","D",null,[],"本題考點是 Reamer(1995)對社會工作業務過失(malpractice)的類型區分。社工原先承諾與案主一同出席公聽會,卻未事先告知即缺席,屬於『應作為而未作為』的疏失——即怠職(未履行應盡職責、疏於作為),故 D 正確。A 瀆職(malfeasance)指從事本不應為的錯誤或不當行為,屬積極的作為過失,與本題『未出席、未告知』的消極不作為不符。B 濫權指逾越或不當使用職權,本題無權力濫用情形。C 侵權在此指侵害案主權利的行為,但本情境核心是未履行約定之照顧義務的疏於作為,最貼切者為怠職。關鍵在辨識『不作為的疏失』對應怠職。",[24,28,32,36,40,44],{"webId":25,"stem":26,"number":27,"year":9,"session":10},"sw-108-1-social-work-025","下列何者非社會工作專業倫理之目的？",25,{"webId":29,"stem":30,"number":31,"year":9,"session":10},"sw-108-1-social-work-027","為了預防業務過失，有些社會工作師在執行業務時會採取防衛性實務。下列何者不屬於防衛性實務？",27,{"webId":33,"stem":34,"number":35,"year":9,"session":10},"sw-108-1-social-work-024","社會工作的發展根基立基於公平正義等概念。從價值面向而言，社會工作是一門怎樣的專業？",24,{"webId":37,"stem":38,"number":39,"year":9,"session":10},"sw-108-1-social-work-028","下列那一項不是 Beauchamp 和 Childress（1979）提出的生命倫理學原則？",28,{"webId":41,"stem":42,"number":43,"year":9,"session":10},"sw-108-1-social-work-023","下列有關臺灣的社會工作倫理守則之敘述，何者正確？①依據社會工作師法第 17 條所制定 ②97 年 3 月 28 日內政部同意核備 ③守則內所稱案主是指接受社會工作服務的個人、家庭與團體 ④社會工作師違反法令、社會工作師公會章程或本守則者，除法令另有處罰規定者外，並不需要受到審議與其他處置",23,{"webId":45,"stem":46,"number":47,"year":9,"session":10},"sw-108-1-social-work-029","強調社工專業服務倫理與正當性無關，而是應該依據良善品格而表現道德行為，這是何種倫理學的主張？",29,1787299245937]