[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":49},["ShallowReactive",2],{"q-sw-108-2-research-methods-007":3},{"subject":4,"subjectSlug":5,"subjectFullName":4,"question":6,"related":24},"社會工作研究方法","research-methods",{"id":7,"webId":8,"year":9,"session":10,"subject":4,"legacy":11,"number":12,"stem":13,"options":14,"answer":19,"answerNote":20,"images":21,"lawTimestamp":9,"explanation":22,"freq":23},"sw-108-2-社會工作研究方法-007","sw-108-2-research-methods-007",108,2,false,7,"在說明變項間因果關係的檢測結果時，必須考量那二種效度？",{"A":15,"B":16,"C":17,"D":18},"內在效度與外在效度","內容效度與效標關聯效度","同時效度與預測效度","聚合效度與區別效度","A",null,[],"本題考點是檢測因果關係結果時須並重的兩種效度,正解為 A 內在效度與外在效度。內在效度指研究能否確認自變項確實造成依變項的變化、能否排除干擾與替代解釋,是因果宣稱本身能否成立的關鍵;外在效度指該因果結論能否推論至其他母體、情境與時間,涉及研究發現的類推性。二者共同界定因果檢測結果的可信度與可推廣程度。B 內容效度與效標關聯效度、C 同時效度與預測效度、D 聚合效度與區別效度,皆屬『測量效度』範疇,處理的是量表是否確實測到欲測構念,與『因果關係檢測』所指的研究設計效度層次不同,故非本題所問。",1,[25,29,33,37,41,45],{"webId":26,"stem":27,"number":28,"year":9,"session":10},"sw-108-2-research-methods-006","確認兩變項因果關係的條件之一是發生的時間順序，已知變項 X 發生的時間在先，變項 Y 發生於後，下列敘述何者最正確？",6,{"webId":30,"stem":31,"number":32,"year":9,"session":10},"sw-108-2-research-methods-008","一位研究者想探討大學生與中學生對於性別偏見是否存有差異，研究者在定義「性別偏見」時，採用的方法是進行直接觀察，記錄大學生與中學生在互動過程中對於性別議題的陳述、對話與反應，並根據紀錄作為對「性別偏見」的測量內容說明。此過程符合下列何項敘述？",8,{"webId":34,"stem":35,"number":36,"year":9,"session":10},"sw-108-2-research-methods-005","研究者試圖尋找變項間的因果關係，下列何種研究設計最能夠確立因果關係？",5,{"webId":38,"stem":39,"number":40,"year":9,"session":10},"sw-108-2-research-methods-009","在量化研究中經常會提出研究架構，且會以箭頭（→）來說明各變項（variable）間的關係假設。若 A 變項在→的右邊時，則 A 變項不可能屬於下列何種變項性質？",9,{"webId":42,"stem":43,"number":44,"year":9,"session":10},"sw-108-2-research-methods-004","針對理論和研究的關係，下列有關演繹與歸納的說法何者錯誤？",4,{"webId":46,"stem":47,"number":48,"year":9,"session":10},"sw-108-2-research-methods-010","某社工員針對自己機構舉辦之照顧者支持團體進行一項評估研究，該社工先了解方案理論，其中認為「分享照顧經驗有助心理健康」，由此推導出「常參加支持團體分享活動的照顧者，心理健康狀況較佳」的假設，這是何種邏輯推理？",10,1787299250033]