[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":49},["ShallowReactive",2],{"q-sw-108-2-social-work-029":3},{"subject":4,"subjectSlug":5,"subjectFullName":4,"question":6,"related":24},"社會工作","social-work",{"id":7,"webId":8,"year":9,"session":10,"subject":4,"legacy":11,"number":12,"stem":13,"options":14,"answer":19,"answerNote":20,"images":21,"lawTimestamp":9,"explanation":22,"freq":23},"sw-108-2-社會工作-029","sw-108-2-social-work-029",108,2,false,29,"「安樂死可以解除個人的痛苦，以及減輕家庭與社會的照顧成本，故應合法化。」此種論點是何種倫理學的主張？",{"A":15,"B":16,"C":17,"D":18},"效益主義","社群主義","義務論","自決論","A",null,[],"本題考點是規範倫理學各理論的辨識。題幹以「解除痛苦、減輕家庭與社會照顧成本」這類後果與整體效益作為安樂死應合法化的理由，判準在於行為能否帶來最大幸福或最小痛苦，這正是效益主義（utilitarianism，源於 Bentham 與 Mill）以結果衡量對錯的核心主張，故選 A。社群主義著重社群共善與成員關係，未以效益計算為判準；義務論（Kant）主張行為對錯取決於是否合乎道德義務，而非後果，與題幹立論相反；自決論強調個人自主決定權，題幹並非訴諸當事人自主，而是訴諸整體效益，故均非所指。",1,[25,29,33,37,41,45],{"webId":26,"stem":27,"number":28,"year":9,"session":10},"sw-108-2-social-work-028","如果某機構的督導知悉自己的社會工作者與開案中的服務對象一起相約出國旅行，通知機構主管是屬於何種義務？",28,{"webId":30,"stem":31,"number":32,"year":9,"session":10},"sw-108-2-social-work-030","一名因意外而導致下半身癱瘓的身心障礙服務對象獨居多年。近日，該服務對象又因故跌倒在地、骨折受傷無力爬起。直到隔日，居家服務員到訪，才被發現送醫。社會工作者為避免服務對象再度有安全風險，故積極促成服務對象入住長期安養單位。為了讓服務對象能夠順利獲得安置，社會工作者在轉介過程中，並未告知服務對象安置機構情況，也向機構隱瞞服務對象在前次安養機構的自殺史。該名社會工作者可能違反什麼社會工作倫理守則？",30,{"webId":34,"stem":35,"number":36,"year":9,"session":10},"sw-108-2-social-work-027","下列關於慈善組織會社（COS）與睦鄰公社運動（Settlement Movement）之敘述，何者正確？",27,{"webId":38,"stem":39,"number":40,"year":9,"session":10},"sw-108-2-social-work-031","精神醫療社會工作可簡單區分為「以院舍和病症為本」和「以社區和病人為本」兩種工作取向，下列敘述何者正確？①以社區和病人為本的工作理念強調以融入社區、精神康復及正常生活為主 ②以社區和病人為本的工作取向注重病人的全人和潛能發展 ③以院舍和病症為本的工作理念是以診斷治療為主 ④以院舍和病症為本的工作取向著重於多元手法和社區的改變",31,{"webId":42,"stem":43,"number":44,"year":9,"session":10},"sw-108-2-social-work-026","從社會工作倫理的風險管理來看，下列何者不屬於 Reamer（2006）所認定的「不當行為」？",26,{"webId":46,"stem":47,"number":48,"year":9,"session":10},"sw-108-2-social-work-032","臺灣的老年女性獨居人數增加趨勢中，看到女性老年未婚人口有增多現象。若從個人層面來看未婚高齡女性的準備進入老年階段的方案，下列那一項不屬於個人層面之需求？",32,1787299249035]