[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":49},["ShallowReactive",2],{"q-sw-109-2-direct-service-019":3},{"subject":4,"subjectSlug":5,"subjectFullName":4,"question":6,"related":24},"社會工作直接服務","direct-service",{"id":7,"webId":8,"year":9,"session":10,"subject":4,"legacy":11,"number":12,"stem":13,"options":14,"answer":19,"answerNote":20,"images":21,"lawTimestamp":9,"explanation":22,"freq":23},"sw-109-2-社會工作直接服務-019","sw-109-2-direct-service-019",109,2,false,19,"下列有關「社會打混」（social loafing）敘述何者錯誤？",{"A":15,"B":16,"C":17,"D":18},"在社團、辦公室、社區、教室裡，打混的人實屬常見","與他人一起工作時，團體任務在增加，但個人努力卻減少","利用多人一起工作機會，有人會搭便車，分享團體創造出來的成果","「冤大頭效益」（sucker effect）會導致後續的「搭便車效益」（free ride effect）","D",null,[],"本題考點是「社會打混」(social loafing,又稱社會賦閒)的概念與相關效應,屬反向題。社會打混指個人在團體中因責任分散而減少個人努力,在社團、辦公室、社區、教室裡皆屬常見(A對);其表現為與他人共事時團體任務雖增加,但個人努力卻減少(B對),並出現有人搭便車、分享團體成果的現象(C對)。選項D把因果順序寫反:應是他人先「搭便車(free ride)」,使認真付出者覺得自己成了「冤大頭(sucker)」而降低投入,即搭便車效應在先、冤大頭效應在後,D將兩者順序顛倒,故錯誤,為答案。",1,[25,29,33,37,41,45],{"webId":26,"stem":27,"number":28,"year":9,"session":10},"sw-109-2-direct-service-018","團體如同社會的縮影，成員可以在團體中練習新行為，然後運用在真實生活中。下列何者與前述內容無關？",18,{"webId":30,"stem":31,"number":32,"year":9,"session":10},"sw-109-2-direct-service-020","下列何者不屬於 Irvin D. Yalom 所羅列的團體療效因子？",20,{"webId":34,"stem":35,"number":36,"year":9,"session":10},"sw-109-2-direct-service-017","下列何者不是社會工作者在提供服務的過程中，常見的倫理兩難議題？",17,{"webId":38,"stem":39,"number":40,"year":9,"session":10},"sw-109-2-direct-service-021","佳文與葛拉瑟（Garvin and Glasser）所提出的治療模型（remedial model）主要概念是「治療目標」，治療目標的選定原則，下列何者錯誤？",21,{"webId":42,"stem":43,"number":44,"year":9,"session":10},"sw-109-2-direct-service-016","處遇性團體的主要目的，下列何者正確？①自助 ②滿足組織需求 ③滿足社區需求 ④社會化 ⑤成長 ⑥教育",16,{"webId":46,"stem":47,"number":48,"year":9,"session":10},"sw-109-2-direct-service-022","下列有關場域論敘述，何者正確？",22,1787299254504]