[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":49},["ShallowReactive",2],{"q-sw-109-2-research-methods-006":3},{"subject":4,"subjectSlug":5,"subjectFullName":4,"question":6,"related":24},"社會工作研究方法","research-methods",{"id":7,"webId":8,"year":9,"session":10,"subject":4,"legacy":11,"number":12,"stem":13,"options":14,"answer":19,"answerNote":20,"images":21,"lawTimestamp":9,"explanation":22,"freq":23},"sw-109-2-社會工作研究方法-006","sw-109-2-research-methods-006",109,2,false,6,"下列那一種研究方法符合「演繹邏輯」的研究設計？",{"A":15,"B":16,"C":17,"D":18},"焦點團體法","自然觀察法","介入實驗設計法","敘事研究法","C",null,[],"本題考點是演繹邏輯(deductive logic)對應的研究設計。演繹邏輯是「由理論到觀察」,先有理論並推導假設,再透過設計來檢驗假設是否成立。介入實驗設計法(C)正是典型演繹取向:研究者依理論預測介入會產生某效果,設定假設,再以實驗操弄自變項並觀察結果以驗證假設,故選C。A焦點團體法、B自然觀察法、D敘事研究法多屬質性、探索取向,是從實地資料出發歸納意義與型態,偏向歸納邏輯,並非以既定假設驗證為設計核心,故皆不符演繹邏輯。判別關鍵在「是否先立假設再驗證」。",1,[25,29,33,37,41,45],{"webId":26,"stem":27,"number":28,"year":9,"session":10},"sw-109-2-research-methods-005","下列那一項敘述是「歸納邏輯」的步驟之一？",5,{"webId":30,"stem":31,"number":32,"year":9,"session":10},"sw-109-2-research-methods-007","研究者試圖從研究中驗證因果關係，當無法執行實驗或準實驗設計可使用橫斷性研究（cross-sectional studies）時，如何增加由橫斷性資料進行因果推論的可能性，下列何者正確？",7,{"webId":34,"stem":35,"number":36,"year":9,"session":10},"sw-109-2-research-methods-004","下列那種問卷調查方法最容易發生反應性（reactivity）誤差？",4,{"webId":38,"stem":39,"number":40,"year":9,"session":10},"sw-109-2-research-methods-008","下列何者不是影響外在效度的因素？",8,{"webId":42,"stem":43,"number":44,"year":9,"session":10},"sw-109-2-research-methods-003","進行一項貧窮狀況的研究時，在操作順序上下列何者為先？",3,{"webId":46,"stem":47,"number":48,"year":9,"session":10},"sw-109-2-research-methods-009","有關概念、概念化與操作定義的說明，下列何者錯誤？",9,1787299254765]