[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":48},["ShallowReactive",2],{"q-sw-110-1-direct-service-007":3},{"subject":4,"subjectSlug":5,"subjectFullName":4,"question":6,"related":23},"社會工作直接服務","direct-service",{"id":7,"webId":8,"year":9,"session":10,"subject":4,"legacy":11,"number":12,"stem":13,"options":14,"answer":19,"answerNote":20,"images":21,"lawTimestamp":9,"explanation":22,"freq":10},"sw-110-1-社會工作直接服務-007","sw-110-1-direct-service-007",110,1,false,7,"下列敘述何者正確？①有人會隱藏在團體裡造成「社會打混」（social loafing）的現象 ②「社會打混」的結果，會引起工作賣力成員的不滿，而導致衝突 ③團體成員的增加必然可以使團體績效相對提高 ④團體成員付出較少的努力，而隨著團體移動前進的情況，稱之為「搭便車效益」（free rider effect） ⑤團體裡有「搭便車」的人，後續難免會出現跟著打混或是做自己想做的事，結果團體不成團體，稱之為「冤大頭效益」（sucker effect） ⑥研究個人拉力與團體拉力，發現團體拉力總是大過於個人拉力的總和",{"A":15,"B":16,"C":17,"D":18},"①③⑤⑥","①②③④","②④⑤⑥","①②④⑤","D",null,[],"本題考點在於團體動力中的成員投入與績效現象。①社會打混(social loafing,躲在團體裡出力減少)確有其事;②社會打混會引起賣力成員不滿而導致衝突;④搭便車效益(free rider effect,付出較少卻隨團體前進);⑤冤大頭效益(sucker effect,不願當被占便宜的人而跟著減少投入),四者皆為正確描述,故答案為 D(①②④⑤)。③錯在「成員增加必然使績效相對提高」——成員增加常因協調成本與社會打混使人均績效下降,非必然提高。⑥錯在「團體拉力總是大過個人拉力總和」——Ringelmann 效應顯示團體人數增加時,總拉力反而低於個別成員拉力之總和,故③⑥皆錯而不選。",[24,28,32,36,40,44],{"webId":25,"stem":26,"number":27,"year":9,"session":10},"sw-110-1-direct-service-006","倫理決策是一個謹慎的過程，當社會工作者面對倫理困境時，下列那一項處理原則錯誤？",6,{"webId":29,"stem":30,"number":31,"year":9,"session":10},"sw-110-1-direct-service-008","有關互惠模型（reciprocal model）的敘述，下列何者錯誤？",8,{"webId":33,"stem":34,"number":35,"year":9,"session":10},"sw-110-1-direct-service-005","會談是社會個案工作的主要工作方法，下列敘述何者錯誤？",5,{"webId":37,"stem":38,"number":39,"year":9,"session":10},"sw-110-1-direct-service-009","團體工作者於帶領非自願團體時，下列那些處遇較為適當？①培養幾位團體成員，促成更多正向團體互動 ②不讓成員有宣洩太多被迫害的負面情緒 ③指出成員違法亂紀的行為並催化其改變動機 ④採用優勢觀點帶領團體",9,{"webId":41,"stem":42,"number":43,"year":9,"session":10},"sw-110-1-direct-service-004","下列何者屬於對案主認知功能的評估？①現實感 ②自殺意圖 ③情感性疾病 ④自我概念",4,{"webId":45,"stem":46,"number":47,"year":9,"session":10},"sw-110-1-direct-service-010","下列那一種團體最有可能有違 Gisela Konopka 所提社會團體工作倫理的界線？",10,1787299260155]