[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":49},["ShallowReactive",2],{"q-sw-110-2-social-work-025":3},{"subject":4,"subjectSlug":5,"subjectFullName":4,"question":6,"related":24},"社會工作","social-work",{"id":7,"webId":8,"year":9,"session":10,"subject":4,"legacy":11,"number":12,"stem":13,"options":14,"answer":19,"answerNote":20,"images":21,"lawTimestamp":9,"explanation":22,"freq":23},"sw-110-2-社會工作-025","sw-110-2-social-work-025",110,2,false,25,"對於無力自我保護的案主群，在未盤點是否有足夠的資源與人力前，就期待有社會支持網絡，可以在危機時提供及時協助，這樣的期待只是「許願清單」。此為下列何種倫理的觀點？",{"A":15,"B":16,"C":17,"D":18},"現實主義","利己主義","權利論","馬克斯主義","A",null,[],"本題考點在於辨識倫理論述背後的立場。題幹強調「未盤點是否有足夠資源與人力前，就期待社會支持網絡能及時救援，只是許願清單」，其論證方式是要求對照現實條件、以可行性檢驗理想主張，這正是現實主義（realism）的倫理觀點——重視實際條件與可達成性，反對脫離資源現實的空泛期待，故選 A。B 利己主義以行為者自身利益為判準，與本題無關。C 權利論主張以個人固有權利為道德基礎，本題並非在論權利。D 馬克思主義著重階級與生產關係的結構分析，題幹未涉及此框架。故最貼切者為現實主義。",1,[25,29,33,37,41,45],{"webId":26,"stem":27,"number":28,"year":9,"session":10},"sw-110-2-social-work-024","下列何者不符合社會工作倫理守則規範？",24,{"webId":30,"stem":31,"number":32,"year":9,"session":10},"sw-110-2-social-work-026","下列那個行為是專業關係中的界線侵犯（boundary violation）？",26,{"webId":34,"stem":35,"number":36,"year":9,"session":10},"sw-110-2-social-work-023","正在攻讀研究所的社會工作者，邀請自己所服務的成年案主參與他的研究，且告知案主參與研究不會影響其接受服務的權利。此舉可能引發下列何種社會工作倫理之討論？",23,{"webId":38,"stem":39,"number":40,"year":9,"session":10},"sw-110-2-social-work-027","下列何者不屬於服務對象自我決定之範圍？",27,{"webId":42,"stem":43,"number":44,"year":9,"session":10},"sw-110-2-social-work-022","下列何者不是Sarah Banks對倫理守則的批評？",22,{"webId":46,"stem":47,"number":48,"year":9,"session":10},"sw-110-2-social-work-028","將低收獨居者、重度身心障礙者的補助款轉入社會工作者自己的個人帳戶，是屬於下列何種業務過失？",28,1787299270087]