[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":49},["ShallowReactive",2],{"q-sw-111-2-research-methods-026":3},{"subject":4,"subjectSlug":5,"subjectFullName":4,"question":6,"related":24},"社會工作研究方法","research-methods",{"id":7,"webId":8,"year":9,"session":10,"subject":4,"legacy":11,"number":12,"stem":13,"options":14,"answer":19,"answerNote":20,"images":21,"lawTimestamp":9,"explanation":22,"freq":23},"sw-111-2-社會工作研究方法-026","sw-111-2-research-methods-026",111,2,false,26,"「可信賴度」是經常被用來評鑑質性研究的嚴謹度，關於提升可信賴度的策略，下列何者正確？",{"A":15,"B":16,"C":17,"D":18},"同儕討論與支持","良好的訪談情境","增加樣本數","增加樣本代表性","A",null,[],"本題考點為提升質性研究可信賴度的策略。依 Lincoln 與 Guba 的質性嚴謹度架構,提升可信賴度的方法包括同儕檢視、三角檢證、長期投入、參與者查核等;A「同儕討論與支持」即同儕簡報(peer debriefing),讓局外同儕檢視分析歷程以減少研究者偏誤,屬正當策略,故選 A。C「增加樣本數」、D「增加樣本代表性」是量化研究提升外在效度\u002F統計推論的作法,質性不以樣本量與代表性論嚴謹度。B「良好的訪談情境」有助蒐集資料品質,但非公認評鑑可信賴度的正式策略,相較 A 不是最佳答案。",1,[25,29,33,37,41,45],{"webId":26,"stem":27,"number":28,"year":9,"session":10},"sw-111-2-research-methods-025","質性研究的觀察須達到的標準，下列何者錯誤？",25,{"webId":30,"stem":31,"number":32,"year":9,"session":10},"sw-111-2-research-methods-027","有關評估研究（evaluation research）的敘述，下列何者正確？",27,{"webId":34,"stem":35,"number":36,"year":9,"session":10},"sw-111-2-research-methods-024","關於紮根理論（grounded theory）的目的，下列何者正確？",24,{"webId":38,"stem":39,"number":40,"year":9,"session":10},"sw-111-2-research-methods-028","這個研究所採用的抽樣方法為何？",28,{"webId":42,"stem":43,"number":44,"year":9,"session":10},"sw-111-2-research-methods-023","質性研究法在社會工作的運用有其精神與原則，下列敘述何者正確？",23,{"webId":46,"stem":47,"number":48,"year":9,"session":10},"sw-111-2-research-methods-029","此研究的分析單位為何？",29,1787299263196]