[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":49},["ShallowReactive",2],{"q-sw-111-2-social-work-022":3},{"subject":4,"subjectSlug":5,"subjectFullName":4,"question":6,"related":24},"社會工作","social-work",{"id":7,"webId":8,"year":9,"session":10,"subject":4,"legacy":11,"number":12,"stem":13,"options":14,"answer":19,"answerNote":20,"images":21,"lawTimestamp":9,"explanation":22,"freq":23},"sw-111-2-社會工作-022","sw-111-2-social-work-022",111,2,false,22,"有關界線侵犯（boundary violation）與界線跨越（boundary crossing）之敘述，下列何者正確？",{"A":15,"B":16,"C":17,"D":18},"界線跨越是指社會工作者與案主之間有侵害和剝削案主利益的雙重關係","界線侵犯是社會工作者與案主之間出現非有益之雙重關係","界線跨越不一定有傷害性，有時有助於處遇","只要有雙重關係就一定不對","C",null,[],"本題考點是Reamer對界線跨越(boundary crossing)與界線侵犯(boundary violation)的區辨。界線侵犯指社工者與案主形成具剝削性、傷害案主利益的雙重關係；界線跨越則指偏離傳統專業界線但不必然造成傷害的行為，有時甚至有助於處遇(如家訪、適度自我揭露)，故正確者為C。A誤把「侵害剝削」的定義套在界線跨越上；B把界線侵犯定義為「非有益之雙重關係」過於寬鬆，侵犯關鍵在傷害與剝削而非僅是無益；D「只要有雙重關係就一定不對」過度絕對，忽略跨越與侵犯之別，均為錯誤。",1,[25,29,33,37,41,45],{"webId":26,"stem":27,"number":28,"year":9,"session":10},"sw-111-2-social-work-021","「優勢觀點」已獲得社會工作實務界之認可與運用，但此觀點的限制為何？",21,{"webId":30,"stem":31,"number":32,"year":9,"session":10},"sw-111-2-social-work-023","關於「價值觀」的特徵，下列何者錯誤？",23,{"webId":34,"stem":35,"number":36,"year":9,"session":10},"sw-111-2-social-work-020","「社會工作者必須以清楚和易懂的言詞告知案主服務的目標、風險和服務限制等，案主可以拒絕或撤回同意的權利」，這是屬於那一項倫理守則規範的內涵？",20,{"webId":38,"stem":39,"number":40,"year":9,"session":10},"sw-111-2-social-work-024","社會工作專業向來致力於探討倫理與價值相關主題，而在 19 世紀末，社會工作專業開始發展之際，此時所關注的倫理焦點主要為何者？",24,{"webId":42,"stem":43,"number":44,"year":9,"session":10},"sw-111-2-social-work-019","下列何者不是女性主義主張的社會工作處遇原則？",19,{"webId":46,"stem":47,"number":48,"year":9,"session":10},"sw-111-2-social-work-025","依 Donagn 的道德論（theory of morality），在進行專業倫理抉擇時，應採行何種方式？",25,1787299262053]