[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":47},["ShallowReactive",2],{"q-sw-112-1-research-methods-039":3},{"subject":4,"subjectSlug":5,"subjectFullName":4,"question":6,"related":23},"社會工作研究方法","research-methods",{"id":7,"webId":8,"year":9,"session":10,"subject":4,"legacy":11,"number":12,"stem":13,"options":14,"answer":19,"answerNote":20,"images":21,"lawTimestamp":9,"explanation":22,"freq":10},"sw-112-1-社會工作研究方法-039","sw-112-1-research-methods-039",112,1,false,39,"從事研究時若造成參與者的利益損失，研究者應如何處理？",{"A":15,"B":16,"C":17,"D":18},"要取得適當代理人的同意書再進行","採取以參與者利益為優先的方式解決問題","應予以安撫繼續進行研究","以研究結果為導向儘速完成","B",null,[],"本題考點在於研究倫理中「不傷害原則」與參與者利益優先的處理方式。當研究造成參與者利益損失時,研究者應以參與者的福祉為最高考量來處理問題,故正解為B。A「取得代理人同意書」是知情同意的程序,無法回復已造成的損失;C「安撫後繼續進行」把研究推進置於參與者利益之上,違反不傷害原則;D「以研究結果為導向儘速完成」更是把研究產出凌駕於人,明顯違背倫理。判準是:任何研究利益都不得優先於參與者的權益與安全,受損時應以參與者利益為先。",[24,28,32,36,40,44],{"webId":25,"stem":26,"number":27,"year":9,"session":10},"sw-112-1-research-methods-038","關於質性研究主題的各種內涵，下列何者錯誤？",38,{"webId":29,"stem":30,"number":31,"year":9,"session":10},"sw-112-1-research-methods-040","事後簡報（debriefing）是指研究者在研究後告知參與者研究目的、方法，並評估參與者對本研究的個人反應，此過程係屬下列何者？",40,{"webId":33,"stem":34,"number":35,"year":9,"session":10},"sw-112-1-research-methods-037","根據 Lincoln 和 Guba 兩位學者的建議，下列何者不是提升質性研究可信度的方法？",37,{"webId":37,"stem":38,"number":10,"year":9,"session":39},"sw-112-2-research-methods-001","某機構社會工作者觀察到數位時代青少年的偏差行為樣態似乎跟過往不太一樣，該機構決定仔細分析服務案件資料以瞭解變化的情形。請問該研究係屬於下列那一種目的？",2,{"webId":41,"stem":42,"number":43,"year":9,"session":10},"sw-112-1-research-methods-036","有關質性研究資料分析的特徵，下列何者錯誤？",36,{"webId":45,"stem":46,"number":39,"year":9,"session":39},"sw-112-2-research-methods-002","下列何者為虛無假設（null hypothesis）？",1787299266331]