[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":47},["ShallowReactive",2],{"q-sw-112-1-research-methods-040":3},{"subject":4,"subjectSlug":5,"subjectFullName":4,"question":6,"related":23},"社會工作研究方法","research-methods",{"id":7,"webId":8,"year":9,"session":10,"subject":4,"legacy":11,"number":12,"stem":13,"options":14,"answer":19,"answerNote":20,"images":21,"lawTimestamp":9,"explanation":22,"freq":10},"sw-112-1-社會工作研究方法-040","sw-112-1-research-methods-040",112,1,false,40,"事後簡報（debriefing）是指研究者在研究後告知參與者研究目的、方法，並評估參與者對本研究的個人反應，此過程係屬下列何者？",{"A":15,"B":16,"C":17,"D":18},"向參與者解釋研究中發生了什麼以及為什麼","試圖確保參與者有能力給予同意","為了獲得研究倫理審查委員會對研究的批准","公開研究者的身分","A",null,[],"本題考點在於事後簡報(debriefing)在研究倫理中的功能定位。事後簡報指研究結束後研究者向參與者說明研究的真正目的、方法與過程,並了解其個人反應,本質是「向參與者解釋研究中發生了什麼以及為什麼」,故正解為A。B「確保參與者有能力給予同意」屬事前知情同意的判斷,時序在前;C「獲得倫理審查委員會批准」是研究前的行政審查程序;D「公開研究者身分」只是揭露身分,不等於完整說明研究內容。判準是:debriefing的核心是事後對參與者的完整說明與情緒關照。",[24,28,32,36,39,43],{"webId":25,"stem":26,"number":27,"year":9,"session":10},"sw-112-1-research-methods-039","從事研究時若造成參與者的利益損失，研究者應如何處理？",39,{"webId":29,"stem":30,"number":10,"year":9,"session":31},"sw-112-2-research-methods-001","某機構社會工作者觀察到數位時代青少年的偏差行為樣態似乎跟過往不太一樣，該機構決定仔細分析服務案件資料以瞭解變化的情形。請問該研究係屬於下列那一種目的？",2,{"webId":33,"stem":34,"number":35,"year":9,"session":10},"sw-112-1-research-methods-038","關於質性研究主題的各種內涵，下列何者錯誤？",38,{"webId":37,"stem":38,"number":31,"year":9,"session":31},"sw-112-2-research-methods-002","下列何者為虛無假設（null hypothesis）？",{"webId":40,"stem":41,"number":42,"year":9,"session":10},"sw-112-1-research-methods-037","根據 Lincoln 和 Guba 兩位學者的建議，下列何者不是提升質性研究可信度的方法？",37,{"webId":44,"stem":45,"number":46,"year":9,"session":31},"sw-112-2-research-methods-003","界定或設定某變項測量之層次（level of measurement），最主要目的是下列何者？",3,1787299266336]